<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CJS Quarterly Underrated Movie #2: Bowfinger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crujonessociety.com/2010/02/03/cjs-quarterly-underrated-movie2-bowfinger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crujonessociety.com/2010/02/03/cjs-quarterly-underrated-movie2-bowfinger/</link>
	<description>Because the internet can&#039;t be all porn...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 02:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: salwon</title>
		<link>http://crujonessociety.com/2010/02/03/cjs-quarterly-underrated-movie2-bowfinger/comment-page-1/#comment-16825</link>
		<dc:creator>salwon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crujonessociety.com/?p=3380#comment-16825</guid>
		<description>I remember renting this, thinking that it might be a good opportunity to see Heather Graham naked.  I have had many, many opportunities since, but this was the only movie until The Hangover where her (non, in this unfortunate case)-naked body wasn&#039;t the best part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember renting this, thinking that it might be a good opportunity to see Heather Graham naked.  I have had many, many opportunities since, but this was the only movie until The Hangover where her (non, in this unfortunate case)-naked body wasn&#8217;t the best part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roxy</title>
		<link>http://crujonessociety.com/2010/02/03/cjs-quarterly-underrated-movie2-bowfinger/comment-page-1/#comment-16819</link>
		<dc:creator>roxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crujonessociety.com/?p=3380#comment-16819</guid>
		<description>I was talked into seeing this movie but I walked out of the theater completely satisfied. It has a patch of weak 20 minutes but overall it was surprisingly hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talked into seeing this movie but I walked out of the theater completely satisfied. It has a patch of weak 20 minutes but overall it was surprisingly hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E Dagger</title>
		<link>http://crujonessociety.com/2010/02/03/cjs-quarterly-underrated-movie2-bowfinger/comment-page-1/#comment-16817</link>
		<dc:creator>E Dagger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crujonessociety.com/?p=3380#comment-16817</guid>
		<description>I never saw this, but having just watched the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uswr9A3SuOY I can see why this movie didn&#039;t catch on. It&#039;s basically impossible to describe in less than a paragraph, and if you&#039;re working that hard to tell the public what a movie is, you&#039;ve already lost.

The trailer&#039;s filled with lots of funny sight gags, but the explanation for the plot is still confusing as hell. Plus, as you alluded to, it seems like a bit too much inside baseball, and you&#039;re right, the public sometimes hates that (e.g. Studio 60). 

However, having recently watched Parenthood again and realizing just how freaking good it is now that I&#039;m older, I&#039;m developing an appreciation for Steve Martin and this looks like fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never saw this, but having just watched the trailer: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uswr9A3SuOY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uswr9A3SuOY</a> I can see why this movie didn&#8217;t catch on. It&#8217;s basically impossible to describe in less than a paragraph, and if you&#8217;re working that hard to tell the public what a movie is, you&#8217;ve already lost.</p>
<p>The trailer&#8217;s filled with lots of funny sight gags, but the explanation for the plot is still confusing as hell. Plus, as you alluded to, it seems like a bit too much inside baseball, and you&#8217;re right, the public sometimes hates that (e.g. Studio 60). </p>
<p>However, having recently watched Parenthood again and realizing just how freaking good it is now that I&#8217;m older, I&#8217;m developing an appreciation for Steve Martin and this looks like fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

